Action Plans / Action Plan 9
Reefs survive when local people benefit from them, and tourism is set up to protect reefs instead of harming them.
Level 9 of 10 · −27 m
Your progressThe three lowest-effort first moves for this Action Plan. Cost levels are qualitative estimates, not quotes.
Why it matters
Municipal fisherfolk have preferential rights in municipal waters; plans built without them fail.
What it takes
Why it matters
Green Fins is a free, voluntary code for dive and snorkel operators (Green Fins (UNEP / The Reef-World Foundation)).
What it takes
Why it matters
A small, ingredient-honest trial links reef care to local livelihoods without overclaiming.
What it takes
Philippine reefs are shaped every day by fisherfolk, boat crews, guides and visitors. This Action Plan’s roadmap starts with listening and voluntary practices, and grows into livelihood ideas and tourism limits that local people choose and keep.
From the easiest work to the most advanced. In planning, and not legal advice.
Stage 1: Beginner
Listen first. Meet barangays, fisherfolk associations, FARMCs, boat associations and local foundations, such as the El Nido Foundation in Palawan (El Nido Foundation, Coral Reef Restoration and Education Program); municipal fisherfolk have preferential rights in municipal waters (Philippine Fisheries Code of 1998, Sec. 91 (RA 8550)). Learn about Green Fins, a free and voluntary code of conduct for dive and snorkel operators (Green Fins (UNEP / The Reef-World Foundation)). Share the boat dish-wash and sunscreen-ingredient ideas as options, not mandates. All of this is low cost and builds the trust the later stages need. Write down what people say they need from the reef, including food, income and safety, before proposing anything. Use local languages where possible and share notes back with the groups who gave their time.
Ready for the next step when: Key community groups have been heard, and their priorities are written down.
Stage 2: Intermediate
Support willing operators with Green Fins-style briefings, mooring use and no-contact snorkeling. Run a small, ingredient-honest trial of phosphate-free boat soap and mineral sunscreen with a local producer if one is interested, as livelihood ideas rather than claims that rules require them. Learn from community models elsewhere, such as Apo Island’s community-managed reserve (Russ and Alcala 1999, management histories of Sumilon and Apo marine reserves) and Malampaya Foundation’s work with Palawan communities (Malampaya Foundation, 2025 Chairman’s Report). Offer short, non-formal training, not accredited courses, which keeps education within the legal limits for this project. Ask boat crews and guides to help design the briefings so the messages sound like their own, not a foreign script.
Ready for the next step when: Operators who opted in are using briefings and moorings, and trial results are reviewed with them.
Stage 3: Advanced
Help keep tourism volumes, moorings, sewage and waste within what the reef and the PAMB can absorb. Evaluate community work with socio-ecological measures, not coral survival alone (Hein et al. 2021). Volunteer programs must never turn into unpermitted coral handling or a paid “adopt a coral” scheme. Any coral or in-water step is led by a Filipino institution that holds the BFAR permits, under a written MOA. The center funds and supports; coral is never sold; and education stays non-formal. Success means reef-friendly livelihoods that local people choose to keep. Share results back with barangays in plain language every year, and let community groups decide which projects continue. Where possible, route paid work, such as boat hire, guiding and surveying, to local people and cooperatives.
Ready for the next step when: Socio-ecological measures show community benefit, and volunteers stay clear of coral handling.
Philippine reef towns from Apo Island and Bohol to Batangas and El Nido depend on tourism and fishing; restoration that ignores dive boats, alternative livelihoods and education will not last.
Feeds Preservation (compliance) and Water Quality (sewage, development). Is fed by Philippines (law and culture) and Science (what visitors are told must be true).
A social, cultural, and environmental history of the Great Barrier Reef in twelve encounters; first published 2013 (paperback listing 2016).
Action Plan 9: Community, Livelihoods & Tourism Done Right · paperback
Filter this Action Plan’s papers by the action they help you take — Preserve, Conserve, Restore, Protect or Regenerate.
Loading research for this Action Plan…
Tourism and livelihoods already shape Philippine reefs, from Apo Island and Bohol to Batangas and Palawan. The useful work is to support fisherfolk, boat crews and existing local organizations, and to trial low-risk visitor practices — including the sunscreen and boat-soap ideas developed on the water-quality hub.
In planning, and not legal advice. This is a working educational plan for a center that is not yet operating or permitted. Confirm every permit with Philippine counsel, BFAR, DENR (including the Biodiversity Management Bureau and the Protected Area Management Board of any protected area), DENR-EMB, the relevant LGU and, in Palawan, the PCSD, before any field work.
Who can lead in-water coral work. Gathering, possessing, selling or exporting corals is generally unlawful in the Philippines, except for scientific or research purposes under a special permit from the Department of Agriculture / BFAR (Philippine Fisheries Code of 1998, Sec. 91 (RA 8550); BFAR FAO 202, s. 2000, Ban on Coral Exploitation and Exportation). Collection and conservation breeding of aquatic wildlife, including coral, is also regulated under FAO 233, issued pursuant to the Wildlife Act, and typically requires a Gratuitous Permit or related BFAR authority (FAO 233 (2010), Aquatic Wildlife Conservation; FAO 233 text (FAOLEX); Wildlife Resources Conservation and Protection Act (RA 9147)). The Constitution reserves exploration, development and utilization of natural resources to Filipino citizens or corporations at least 60% Filipino-owned, and the 13th Regular Foreign Investment Negative List reserves utilization of marine resources in archipelagic waters, the territorial sea and the EEZ to Philippine nationals (1987 Constitution, Art. XII, Sec. 2; 13th Regular Foreign Investment Negative List (EO 113, s. 2026)). For those reasons, any in-water coral work contemplated here would be led by Filipino scientific and community partners, not by a foreign principal acting alone.
The permit chain (to be confirmed site by site, anywhere in the Philippines) generally includes: review by the Protected Area Management Board where a site lies inside a protected area under the Expanded NIPAS Act (Expanded NIPAS Act of 2018 (RA 11038)); an Environmental Compliance Certificate or Certificate of Non-Coverage from DENR-EMB under the EIS System (PD 1586 / Philippine EIS System (DENR-EMB ECC/CNC)); BFAR authority for any coral handling; and local government permits. Municipal fisherfolk have preferential rights in municipal waters under the Fisheries Code. Some regions add their own layer. In Palawan, for example, that means Palawan Council for Sustainable Development (PCSD) zoning/ECAN certification and SEP clearance under RA 7611 (Strategic Environmental Plan for Palawan Act (RA 7611)); and, at El Nido, review by the Protected Area Management Board of the El Nido–Taytay Managed Resource Protected Area (Presidential Proclamation No. 32, s. 1998 (ENTMRPA)).
Existing work across the country. Filipino institutions already lead reef science and restoration nationwide: the University of the Philippines Marine Science Institute and the Marine Environment and Resources Foundation in Bolinao and beyond (UP MSI coral cryobank announcement; MERF / ACIAR coral larval restoration project); Silliman University’s Institute of Environmental and Marine Sciences in the Visayas and Mindanao (Silliman University, 10 Dec 2025 — SU-IEMS coral reef restoration research; Silliman University, 29 Jun 2026 — SU-IEMS fish visual census training, Davao Oriental); UP Visayas (UP Visayas CFOS-IMFO, coral reef assessment training in Antique); Mindanao State University at Naawan (MSU at Naawan, Coral Reef Management (CoReM) Hub); Davao Oriental State University in Pujada Bay (DORSU, 23 Jul 2025 — Pujada Bay artificial reef results); the Coastal Conservation and Education Foundation (CCEF, Aug 2024 — 3D-printed clay reef workshop, Maria, Siquijor); and local programs such as the El Nido Foundation in Palawan (El Nido Foundation, Coral Reef Restoration and Education Program). A planned center should complement that work, not overwrite it. A public record of past work is not a partnership agreement, and current BFAR permit numbers were not independently verified for this page.
A possible local livelihood and visitor-education project is a small, locally made line of mineral sunscreens in a reef-tourism town (for example in Palawan, Bohol, Cebu or Batangas), and a tour-boat briefing that asks guests to check ingredients rather than trust a “reef-safe” label. The scientific concern is specific. Downs and colleagues (2016) reported toxicopathological effects of the UV filter oxybenzone (benzophenone-3) on coral planulae and cultured primary cells, and documented environmental contamination in Hawaii and the U.S. Virgin Islands (Downs et al. 2016, oxybenzone effects on coral planulae).
This review did not find a Philippine national law, a Palawan ordinance, or an El Nido or Boracay municipal ordinance that bans oxybenzone or requires “reef-safe” sunscreen. “Reef-safe” is not treated here as a legal term. A pilot would therefore be voluntary: educate boat crews and guests, prefer mineral (zinc oxide or titanium dioxide) formulas, and pair sunscreen with rash guards so less product is needed. It is framed as a possible community product, not as a claim that a product already exists or that a rule requires it.
A second possible livelihood and practice project is a phosphate-free, readily biodegradable dish soap for bangka and tour boats, plus a simple rule of keeping wash-up and greywater off the reef. Nutrients, organic matter and sediment in coastal runoff are well documented stressors of coral reefs: they can reduce coral growth and recruitment and favour algae, bioeroders and disease (Fabricius 2005, terrestrial runoff and coral reefs; Bartley et al. 2014, sediment and watersheds). The Philippine Clean Water Act (RA 9275) sets a national policy to prevent pollution of fresh, brackish and marine waters, including from land-based sources, and applies water-quality standards and civil and penal provisions regardless of the source of pollution (Philippine Clean Water Act of 2004 (RA 9275)). RA 8970 already prohibits the manufacture, importation, distribution and sale of laundry and industrial detergents that contain hard (poorly biodegradable) surfactants (RA 8970, prohibition on hard surfactants in laundry and industrial detergents).
This review did not find a Philippine law or MARINA circular that specifically requires phosphate-free dish soap on island-hopping boats. MARINA Circular SR-2020-02 requires sewage treatment plants and/or holding tanks on Philippine-registered ships in line with MARPOL Annex IV; that rule is about sewage on ships, not greywater from small tour bancas (MARINA Circular SR-2020-02, sewage treatment plants on PH-registered ships). A boat-soap pilot would therefore be a voluntary practice and local product: use a soft-surfactant, phosphate-free soap, wash dishes in a tub, and land greywater for proper disposal rather than over a reef. It is not a claim that current boat rules already mandate this product.
Action Plan 2, Water quality: product pilots → · Action Plan 9, Community & tourism →
A beginner-to-expert arc: start with why the work matters, then methods and sources, then local application with Filipino partners.
Learn how tourism can harm reefs (contact, anchors, sewage, sunscreen chemicals) and how community programs can help if they are honest about limits (Hein et al. 2021).
Read Green Fins guidance and the product-pilot evidence on the water-quality hub. Learn fisherfolk preferential rights in municipal waters.
Co-design education and livelihood trials with barangays and local foundations, without turning volunteers into unpermitted coral gardeners.
These are other organisations’ resources and public programs. Listing them is not a partnership claim.
Answers are limited to points we can cite from the research library or from official and peer-reviewed sources. Questions we cannot answer that way are left out.
Tourism can fund protection, but it can also damage reefs through anchors, diver and snorkeler contact, sewage and some sunscreen chemicals (Downs et al. 2016 on oxybenzone). Hein et al. (2021) argue that restoration can support local reef services only alongside broader resilience work and honest goals. Downs et al. 2016, oxybenzone effects on coral planulae; Hein et al. 2021
Green Fins is a UNEP-linked, voluntary code and assessment program for dive and snorkel operators, run with The Reef-World Foundation, to reduce the environmental impact of marine tourism. Green Fins (UNEP / The Reef-World Foundation)
It is a set of methods — gardening, larval work, structure, and others — used to add or recover coral at local scales. Reviews say most projects are small and short, and that restoration is not a substitute for protection, water quality and climate action (Boström-Einarsson et al. 2020; Hein et al. 2021). This site has no adoption or donation forms. Boström-Einarsson et al. 2020; Hein et al. 2021
